Should you switch financial adviser?
A long relationship is useful when it still works. It is not a reason to keep paying for a service you no longer understand or value.
Choose an adviser for your needs →
Why do people consider switching?
What should you check before moving?
Understand any exit charges, product consequences, ongoing service commitments and whether changing adviser also requires moving investments or platforms. Switching adviser and switching financial products are not necessarily the same decision.
Compare the replacement properly
Check regulation, specialist fit, client minimums, fee structure and what the new adviser will do that is materially different from the existing service.
What if the problem is a complaint?
If you believe something has gone wrong rather than simply wanting a different service, use the firm's complaints process and follow the FCA's consumer guidance where relevant.
Identify whether the problem is service, fit or expectations
Write down the concern in concrete terms. An agreed review that never happened is different from wanting more frequent contact than the contract provides. A change in your circumstances may create a need outside an otherwise competent adviser's specialism. Naming the problem helps you decide whether it can be resolved within the existing relationship.
Compare what was promised with what was delivered. Look for the service agreement, review records, recommendations and responses to important questions. Investment performance alone is an incomplete measure: an agreed lower-risk approach can lag a rising market without being unsuitable, while a strong return does not excuse missing service.
Give the firm a clear opportunity to explain an ordinary service concern. Ask for a specific remedy and timetable. If identity, pressure or suspected misconduct is the concern, prioritise verification and appropriate reporting rather than treating it as a routine relationship discussion.
Compare the cost of staying with the cost of moving
A new relationship can involve initial advice charges, time gathering records and disruption. The existing firm may offer a different adviser or a narrower service that addresses the problem. Consider those options alongside a new firm, without allowing inconvenience to become a reason to accept persistent failings.
Use a written comparison with three columns: keep the existing service, change the service within the firm, appoint another firm. Under each, record the work provided, future cost, transition cost and responsibility for outstanding actions. Do not assume that moving advisers means transferring the underlying investments.
An illustrative client might be satisfied with a pension plan but frustrated by slow responses about a business sale. The issue could be a new specialist need rather than failure of the pension work. Another client may be paying for annual reviews that have repeatedly not happened. Those situations call for different conversations and evidence.
Set a decision point
Agree what improvement you need and when you will review whether it occurred. If you decide to move, secure the replacement arrangement before cancelling services that support important ongoing decisions. Clarify how payments, reviews and urgent queries will be handled during the transition.
Keep any complaint about past service separate from choosing future support. You do not need to remain with a firm to preserve a factual record of what happened, but retain documents before access changes. Use the formal complaints process where appropriate rather than relying on a handover discussion to resolve compensation questions.
Sources and further reading
MoneyHelper - Choosing a financial adviser ↗
