How many financial advisers should I speak to?
Speaking to more than one adviser can make price, service and specialist fit much easier to judge.
Choose an adviser for your needs →
There is no compulsory number
You can appoint the first adviser you speak to if you are satisfied with the service and price, but comparing several can give useful context. MoneyHelper encourages consumers to contact more than one adviser and compare costs and service.
Compare the things that actually differ
When can you stop comparing?
Once you understand the alternatives and one adviser clearly fits your needs, continuing to collect quotes can add little. The goal is an informed choice, not the largest possible spreadsheet.
Advisedly's approach
You can read Advisedly's guides, explore published fees and check FCA records without submitting an enquiry. If you request an introduction, Advisedly reviews your enquiry and contacts you about a possible next step. This is not an automated ranking or a guarantee that a suitable receiving firm is available.
Make each conversation answer the same question
The value of speaking to several firms comes from comparing their approach to the same need. Prepare a short brief before making contact: the decision, approximate assets involved, important deadline and whether you want a specific piece of work or a continuing relationship. Avoid giving one firm a retirement question and another an investment-management question, then treating the quotes as interchangeable.
Start with an introductory conversation and confirm whether it is free. You do not need to pay several firms to produce full recommendations merely to assess service fit. A firm should be able to describe the work it could undertake, its charging basis and its relevant experience before you agree to paid advice.
Keep a simple comparison record. Write down the named contact, the legal firm, advice scope, proposed output, first-year cost, ongoing cost and any unanswered questions. Add how clearly the firm explained its limitations. Confidence in a presentation is less useful than a clear explanation of responsibility.
When another quote adds useful information
A further conversation is useful when the first quotes differ in scope or leave a material question unresolved. One adviser may propose a one-off retirement plan, another an annual investment service. Ask each to explain why that service matches your brief before concluding that one is cheaper.
For example, a fictional £1,800 planning quote and a 0.75% ongoing quote on £240,000 both initially involve £1,800. The first may be a single project; the second may repeat every year and exclude setup costs. Matching cash amounts do not make the jobs equivalent. Ask what happens after delivery, whether implementation is included and who reviews later changes.
More conversations are less useful once they repeat the same information. A sensible stopping point is when you can explain why your preferred firm fits, how its costs compare and what its limitations are. You should also have resolved any mismatch in identity, permissions or service expectations.
Avoid comparing only the person in the first meeting
Find out who will actually produce the advice and who will remain your contact. Some firms use a business-development colleague for the initial conversation. That can work well, but you should understand when you will meet the responsible adviser and how the handover happens.
Tell firms if you are comparing options and give yourself time to read the written terms. Do not sign multiple implementation authorities while still shopping around. If a specialist deadline limits your choice, explain that early and ask for a realistic timetable rather than assuming that a fast appointment means fast completion.
Sources and further reading
MoneyHelper - Choosing a financial adviser ↗
