The Bradbury pound: the small paper note that entered a wartime economy

Illustration inspired by the subject; not an archival image of the events described.
On 7 August 1914, a new £1 Treasury note entered circulation. Printed in black on white and signed by Sir John Bradbury, it became known by his surname. A week later, a ten-shilling note followed.
These modest pieces of paper belong to the financial history of the opening weeks of the First World War. Their surviving details reveal how an emergency monetary response becomes an object people can actually hold and use.
An official signature became an everyday name
The Bank of England's catalogue of withdrawn notes records the first £1 issue's date, design and materials. The notes were printed on postage-stamp paper, from designs prepared at the Royal Mint using sketches by Frederick Atterbury.
The catalogue attributes the Bradbury nickname to the signature of the Treasury's permanent secretary. It also records the first ten-shilling issue on 14 August 1914, printed in red on white.
The distinction between the two values mattered in everyday use. Under the pre-decimal system, ten shillings represented half a pound. Different denominations allowed different amounts to be exchanged without requiring the same combination of coins.
The Treasury and the Bank were different issuers
These were Treasury notes. Their presence in the Bank's historical catalogue should not obscure that institutional distinction.
The issuer is part of a banknote's meaning. A note is more than a printed number or an attractive design: it belongs to a legal and administrative arrangement. Identifying whose obligation or authority it represents is a different task from recognising its face value.
That is why the signature is historically interesting. It connects a small circulating object to the institution standing behind it, even when everyday users encounter only the name printed on the paper.
The surrounding financial system was under strain
The Bank's unpublished war history describes the reopening of banks on Friday 7 August and the emergency arrangements affecting payments and lending. Its account notes that the issue of Treasury notes helped restore some confidence among banks.
This was not simply a redesign undertaken for aesthetic reasons. The notes formed part of a wider response to disruption in the financial system at the start of war.
At the same time, the historical account should not be reduced to one object solving every problem. Notes, lending arrangements and rules about postponed payments addressed connected but different pressures.
Money has a practical form
A monetary system needs ways for people to settle ordinary obligations. The physical form of money can therefore matter during an emergency: denominations, printing capacity, distribution and public recognition all become operational concerns.
The first Bradbury notes make that practical side visible. Their materials and simple appearance record a moment when producing a usable means of payment was an urgent administrative task.
The fact that a note could be printed on paper associated with another official use is also a reminder that institutions work with available production methods. Financial history is partly the history of workshops, printing processes and documents, not only policy announcements.
An object with more than one date
The first issue's catalogue entry records that it ceased to be legal tender in June 1920. Issue dates, replacement designs and withdrawal dates give a banknote a lifecycle beyond the emergency that first produced it.
Those dates also distinguish historical face value from present collectable value. A note marked £1 is an artefact of a former monetary arrangement; its value to a collector is a separate question that this account does not assess.
The Bradbury pound's story lies in the connection between a national emergency and a small, recognisable object. It shows how financial institutions make policy tangible, one printed promise at a time.
Sources and context
This historical feature draws on published records. It is not a first-hand account or an interview. Historical rules and protections should not be assumed to apply today.
Sources checked 18 September 2026. Our editorial standards.